← Back to Demos
Steff's Learning Lab
Compliance judgment practice

The Evidence Gap

An AI-generated recommendation is about to reach a customer. It sounds confident. The evidence behind it does not.

What you will practice Decide when an AI-supported recommendation is ready to use, when it needs verification, and when compliance should be involved.

An original scenario built for this portfolio, not based on any employer's real systems, people, or data.

Customer Recommendation Review
12 minutes until send
Jordan, Customer Success 2:18 PM

Can you approve this recommendation? The customer is waiting, and the AI summary says the change is compliant. I only need a quick yes.

Workspace Access Recommendation Confidence: High
  • External collaborators may be granted editor access.
  • Internal notes remain protected under the current workspace settings.
  • No additional consent or review is required.

What should you do next?

Choose the action you would take before the recommendation reaches the customer.

Look for the difference between confidence, evidence, and authority.

You completed the review

You can now separate a confident AI output from a defensible compliance decision.

Use this decision pattern

Verify → Identify the gap → Escalate precisely. This keeps routine review with the business while bringing Compliance into the questions that truly require judgment.

Watch for this signal

When an AI output makes a legal, policy, privacy, or consent claim without a current source, treat that as a stop-and-check moment.